5 big questions about how tech will look under Trump
Tech Policy Shifts Under New Leadership #
The incoming administration is expected to redefine the government’s approach toward the tech industry, potentially reshaping users’ experiences, from online content exposure to interactions with AI systems. Historically, there has been tension between the leadership and tech giants. High-profile issues like the proposed TikTok ban and a legal challenge that could dismantle Google emerged during the previous term.
However, there have been significant shifts in stance regarding these issues. The administration has suggested it no longer seeks to ban TikTok or dismantle Google, though legislative momentum on TikTok is already in motion, with a potential ban looming if it remains under its current ownership. Despite this, experts believe only certain legal tactics might avert the impending ban.
Amidst these changes, discussions over AI regulation intensify, with calls for oversight contrasted by advocacy for minimal regulation to spur innovation. The current administration’s platform previously committed to repealing existing guidelines that manage AI’s risks, potentially paving the way for federal laws to replace varied state regulations.
The topic of social media “censorship” remains contentious, with potential reinterpretation of Section 230 — a law shielding platforms from liability for user content — on the table. Potential new rules might alter how platforms manage content, raising concerns about their ability to control harmful or false information.
The realm of antitrust enforcement faces possible relaxation. This includes a shift toward more favorable conditions for corporate mergers and acquisitions, potentially allowing increased market consolidation and higher prices as a result. The administration’s stance may influence ongoing cases against major players like Google and Apple.
The prospect of tech policy alignment across political parties exists, notably concerning children’s online safety. Yet, despite bipartisan interest, substantial legislative progress remains elusive, hindered by disagreements on implementation details.